What is A Law Enacted By A Legislative Body?

A law is a rule or set of rules, usually enacted by a legislative body, which a society, state, or community recognizes as binding.

Checkout this video:

What is a law?

A law is a rule or set of rules, enacted by a legislative body, which a society recognizes as binding upon its members and which it may enforce by the imposition of penalties.

What is a legislative body?

A legislative body is a deliberative assembly with the authority to make laws for a political entity such as a country or city.

What is the purpose of a law?

The purpose of a law is to regulate and control the behavior of individuals and organizations within a society. Laws are enacted by legislative bodies, such as Congress or Parliament, and they are enforced by executive agencies, such as the police or military. Individuals who violate the law may be subject to sanctions, such as fines or imprisonment.

What are the different types of laws?

There are four different types of law, Criminal, Civil, Common, and Statutory.

Criminal law is the body of law that relates to crime. It proscribes conduct perceived as threatening, harmful, or otherwise endangering to the property, health, safety and moral welfare of people inclusive of one’s self. Most criminal law is established by statute, which is to say that the laws are enacted by a legislature. It includes the punishment of people who violate these laws. Criminal law varies according to jurisdiction, and differs from civil law, where emphasis is more on dispute resolution and victim compensation than on punishment.

Civil law (also known as private law) is a body of rules that sets out the rights and duties between individuals (as opposed to the rights and duties of the state vis-à-vis its citizens). It regulates relationships between private citizens in areas such as family relations (marriage/divorce), contracts (employment/agency), property (neighbourhood disputes), tort (negligence/intentional wrongs) etc. Unlike criminal law, it is not primarily concerned with punishing individuals who break the law but rather with protecting their rights and providing remedy when these have been breached. Civil law systems trace their roots back to Roman Law (the system used in ancient Rome). The Justinian Code (compiled in 6th century AD) was an important early codification of civil law principles; it was later rediscovered by 11th century Italy and re-popularised throughout Europe through its influence on universities such as Bologna and Cambridge . The primary source of civil law today remains codifications like the Justinian Code; however codifications only form a small part modern civil procedure systems which also draw significantly from common law systems. Another significant source for modern civil procedure comes from the Napoleonic Code which was compiled during Napoleon’s rule over France after he conquered most of continental Europe at the outset of the 19th century.. The main characteristic feature which differentiates civil procedure systems around the world today is whether they use an accusatorial system or an inquisitorial system . Under an accusatorial system – prevalent in countries such as Germany , USA , Japan – cases go before a judge who acts primarily as an impartial referee between contesting parties; under an inquisitorial system – prevalent in countries such as France , Italy , Spain – cases go before one or more judges who act more like prosecutors actively looking into allegations made against defendants..

Common Law is sometimes called case law or precedent because every common law decision becomes a binding precedent for future courts in similar cases . stare decisis ) Stare decisis means “let it stand” because once a court decides how a particular situation should be treated under legal principles then all future similar situations will be treated identically unless experience shows that this would be unjust or impractical . For this reason common law can be seen as evolutionary ; it develops incrementally over time according to changing social needs rather than being created afresh by legislators . Court decisions from earlier times may still provide persuasive authority even when they are no longer technically binding . Many countries – especially English speaking ones – have strongcommon legal traditions which have evolved independently but similar shared traditions nevertheless exist on other continents such as South Africa , Latin America or Asia ; while others mix elements from both common legal systems and civil legal systems such as Quebec due its history under both French rule then British rule.. Wherever English settlers went they took their common legal tradition with them so that many countries across the world today share some degree what has become known Anglo-American commonlaw tradition; while others blend this with indigenous traditions to varying degrees e.g. Singapore , India .. Comparing three representative nations: England & Wales : United States : Canada we see immediately some important differences: firstly although all three have some sorta written constitution ; only Canada has a constitution which occupies ‘supreme’ legislative precedence so that parliament cannot pass laws which contradict it without first amendingthe constitution itself . Secondly only in US federal courts do juries playaprominent role in trials giving verdicts on both questions offactand questionsoflaw ; elsewhere including England & Walesand Canada juriesonly decidequestions offact .. Thirdly although all three have formal appellate courts vested with powersofjudicial review overlower courts none does so nearlyto sameextent asthe US Supreme Court whose decisions on constitutionalmattersare effectively finaland binding onall other UScourts whereasin England& Walesfor instancethe House Lords(finalappellatecourt until2009) couldonlyreviewfindings offactby jury intrialifLord Chancellorgrantedleavefor aparticularreason such asdangeruserroror manifestunfairness.. Finally note thatUS judgesarenominatedby presidents subjectto confirmationby SenatewhereasinEngland &Walesjudgesare appointeddirectlyby QueenonadviceofMinister forJusticewho makest

How are laws enacted?

Laws are created through a process called enactment. Enactment occurs when a legislative body, such as Congress, passes a bill. The bill then goes to the president, who either signs it into law or vetoes it. If the president vetoes a bill, the veto can be overridden by a two-thirds vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate.

How does the lawmaking process work?

In the United States, the lawmaking process usually starts when a bill is introduced in Congress. Congress is the legislative body that consists of the Senate and the House of Representatives. The bill is then assigned to a committee for further study. If the committee approves the bill, it moves on to the floor of the Senate or House for debate and a vote. If it passes in both chambers, it goes to the President for signature or veto.

Who enforces the law?

There are many different agencies that enforce the law, including local police, state troopers, and federal agencies. The type of agency that enforces the law depends on the type of law that has been broken.

What are the consequences of breaking the law?

There are many consequences of breaking the law, ranging from minor penalties such as a fine to major penalties such as imprisonment. Depending on the severity of the offense and the jurisdiction in which it is committed, the consequences can be very serious. In some cases, a person may be sentenced to death.

What are some examples of laws?

Laws are rules that everyone in a community must follow. They are made by a group of people called legislators. Some examples of laws are:
-You must go to school until you are 16 years old.
-You must wear a seat belt when you are in a car.
-You cannot drive a car if you have been drinking alcohol.
-You cannot kill another person.

What are the different interpretations of the law?

There are different interpretations of what a law enacted by a legislative body actually is. Some people believe that it is a binding agreement between the government and the people, while others believe that it is simply a set of guidelines that the government uses to make decisions.